Highlights

id905468197

a global level, a recent Oxfam report estimates that the richest 1 percent now “own more wealth than 95 percent of humanity.” This extreme inequality is corrosive, damaging economies, societies, and democracy.

🔗 View Highlight

id905468335

Investment in infrastructure like public transit boosts growth, productivity, and incomes. Investment in affordable housing, which eases housing shortages and contributes to lower rents, is not only good for renters but also for businesses that struggle to recruit workers who can’t find affordable homes close to work.

🔗 View Highlight

id905468348

higher inequality worsens a wide range of health and social outcomes, including life expectancy, infant mortality, rates of mental illness, and social trust.

🔗 View Highlight

id905470222

Extreme inequality is also corrosive to democracy, with a growing body of political science research showing that income and wealth concentration has a distorting influence on politics and policy outcomes.

🔗 View Highlight

id905482982

a well-designed wealth tax must have a comprehensive base, applying to all types of assets equally (rather than exempting certain types of assets such as real estate, which would make tax avoidance by shifting between asset classes easy and likely).

🔗 View Highlight

id905483002

Second, a wealth tax should be narrowly targeted on the superrich, excluding upper-middle-class households that may find it more onerous to make payments if their largest assets are illiquid.

🔗 View Highlight

id905483026

Third, an effective wealth tax must make use of extensive third-party reporting of assets particularly from financial institutions, rather than relying too heavily on self-reporting as in the case of some older wealth taxes.

🔗 View Highlight