Highlights

id569491996

question how Disney can simultaneously declare that it is purging content because it wasn’t worth the cost, while also asserting the move will lead to a staggering $1.5 billion in losses. There is an obvious upshot to this approach: the bigger hit that Disney claims, the larger the potential tax write-off for the company.

🔗 View Highlight

id569492091

Beyond the tax write-offs, removing content that isn’t helping platforms retain or bring in new subscribers is a way to cut spending on residual payments to writers and actors as well as avoid paying licensing costs.

🔗 View Highlight

id569492600

Disney is claiming two contradictory things: both that the assets were producing so little value that it’s cheaper to destroy them than to keep them and that the assets were worth $1.5 billion.

🔗 View Highlight